
For Ontario employers, recruiters, and staffing agencies. A clear guide to the 2026 job posting law changes, including salary disclosure, AI transparency, and record-keeping rules.
Starting January 1, 2026, Ontario employers must follow new requirements for any publicly advertised job posting. These rules are designed to make hiring more transparent, fair and consistent for job seekers. If you are an employer, recruiter or staffing agency, it is important to understand what is changing, why it matters and how to stay compliant.
Across Canada, the U.S., and the EU, hiring is moving toward greater transparency, and employers who adapt early will stay competitive.
Below is a simple breakdown of what this means for you.
These new rules go far beyond simple administration. They directly affect how employers attract talent, how candidates judge job opportunities and how hiring teams structure their processes. They reflect a larger shift toward fairness, clarity and accountability across the hiring landscape.
Here is why the new rules are important:
"Clear salary disclosure saves time for both employers and candidates. Transparency leads to more honest, efficient hiring conversations."
Carlos Martins
Employment Specialist at Starlings in Guelph, Ontario
"Clear salary ranges and transparent AI disclosure remove guesswork for job seekers and signal good faith from employers. That trust is what attracts strong talent."
Elizabeth Rotolo
Senior Associate Director of Graduate Programs, Bentley University
Here is what employers must include in any publicly posted job:
These rules apply to organizations with 25 or more employees on the day the posting is published.
If your organization uses artificial intelligence to screen, assess, or select applicants, your job posting must state this clearly. The disclosure requirement is broad and covers any system that generates predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing hiring outcomes.
What counts as AI in hiring:
Compliant disclosure examples:
Basic disclosure (minimum requirement):
"This employer uses artificial intelligence technology to assist in screening, assessing, or selecting applicants for this position."
Enhanced transparency (recommended):
"We use AI-powered resume screening software to help identify qualified candidates. All applications are also reviewed by our hiring team. If you have questions about how AI is used in our hiring process, please contact [recruitment contact]."
For ATS users:
"Applications are processed through an applicant tracking system that uses automated screening. Keywords related to job requirements help prioritize qualified candidates for human review."
For video interview tools:
"This role uses AI-assisted video interview technology to analyze responses and help assess candidate fit. Final hiring decisions are made by our recruitment team based on multiple evaluation factors."
What NOT to do:
Even if your AI use seems minimal (e.g., basic keyword filtering in your ATS), err on the side of disclosure. Transparency builds trust with candidates and demonstrates compliance.
Understanding the consequences of non-compliance helps employers prioritize these requirements appropriately.
What happens if you don't comply:
The Employment Standards Act (ESA) provides enforcement mechanisms for violations of job posting requirements. While specific administrative penalties for O. Reg. 476/24 violations have not yet been published in detail, the ESA framework includes:
Practical risk considerations:
Even where enforcement hasn't been aggressive in early implementation, non-compliance creates several risks:
Penalties under the ESA apply broadly to employment standards violations. Employers should treat job posting requirements with the same compliance rigor as wage and hour rules.
If your organization has fewer than 25 employees, these rules do not legally apply. However, following them is still a smart move for several reasons:
Even if the rules don’t legally apply yet, following them now builds trust, reduces future risk, and makes it easier to scale as regulations expand.
The best way to understand compliance is to see all requirements integrated into a real posting. Below is a Marketing Coordinator example showing how salary disclosure, AI transparency, vacancy status, and candidate communication work together.
Job Title: Marketing Coordinator
Company: [Your Company Name]
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Compensation: $55,000 - $70,000 annually (based on experience and qualifications)
Vacancy Status: This posting is for an existing vacancy.
About the Role:
[Standard job description content...]
Requirements:
Note: We welcome applications from all qualified candidates, including those who gained their experience outside Canada.
Application Process:
This employer uses artificial intelligence technology to assist in screening and assessing applications for this position. All candidates who complete an interview will be notified of the final hiring decision within 45 days.
Key compliance elements demonstrated:
✅ Salary range disclosed
✅ Vacancy status stated
✅ AI use disclosed
✅ No Canadian experience requirement
✅ Clear timeline for candidate notification
Note for employers: This example is for guidance only. Consult your HR or legal team to ensure your specific postings meet all regulatory requirements.
The 2026 changes in Ontario are part of a much broader global shift toward pay transparency and clearer hiring practices. The jurisdictions listed in the table above represent the leading edge of requirements now active across North America and Europe.
From early adopters like British Columbia and California (2023) to the European Union's 2026 implementation across 27 member states, governments are requiring employers to disclose salary ranges, outline hiring criteria, and demonstrate transparency in how roles are evaluated. Ontario's new requirements place it squarely within this global movement, signaling that transparent hiring is becoming the standard rather than the exception.
| Job Posting Law Changes | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Key Requirement | Effective |
| Ontario | Salary range + AI disclosure (25+ employees) | Jan 2026 |
| Colorado | Salary range + benefits + internal promotion notice (all employers) | Jan 2021 |
| Washington | Salary range + benefits disclosure (15+ employees) | Jan 2023 |
| Maryland | Wage range in job postings | Oct 2024 |
| Connecticut | Salary range in postings (all employers) | Oct 2023 |
| Rhode Island | Wage range disclosure on request | Jan 2023 |
| Illinois | Salary ranges and benefits disclosure | 2025 |
| British Columbia | Salary ranges in job postings | 2023 |
| California | Salary ranges for employers with 15+ staff | 2023 |
| New York | Statewide pay transparency | 2023 |
| European Union | Pre-interview salary disclosure + gender pay gap reporting | Jun 2026 |
As these standards become the norm, employers are expected to adapt. Job seekers, in turn, are becoming more informed and selective. Tools like Yotru help bridge this gap by supporting compliant, transparent, and ATS-ready job postings that align with evolving regulations and modern hiring expectations.

Team Yotru
Employability Systems & Applied Research
Team Yotru
Employability Systems & Applied Research
We bring expertise in career education, workforce development, labor market research, and employability technology. We partner with training providers, career services teams, nonprofits, and public-sector organizations to turn research and policy into practical tools used in real employment and retraining programs. Our approach balances evidence and real hiring realities to support employability systems that work in practice. Follow us on LinkedIn.
Ontario is introducing new requirements to improve transparency in hiring. Employers must disclose salary ranges, explain any use of AI in screening, and retain job posting records for compliance.
This content is for employers, HR teams, and recruiters navigating Ontario’s updated hiring requirements. It supports organizations that need clear guidance on compliance, transparency, and responsible hiring practices as regulations evolve.
This analysis draws on Ontario legislation, government guidance, and industry commentary to explain how the 2026 job posting requirements apply in practice. It also incorporates insights from employment and HR professionals to reflect how these rules affect real-world hiring, compliance, and recruitment processes.
This article provides general guidance based on employment standards research and HR best practices. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with qualified legal or HR professionals. Employers should consult their legal counsel or HR team to ensure compliance with Ontario Regulation 476/24 and the Employment Standards Act as they apply to their specific circumstances.
If you are working on employability programs, hiring strategy, career education, or workforce outcomes and want practical guidance, you are in the right place.
Yotru supports individuals and organizations navigating real hiring systems. That includes resumes and ATS screening, career readiness, program design, evidence collection, and alignment with employer expectations. We work across education, training, public sector, and industry to turn guidance into outcomes that actually hold up in practice.
Part of Yotru's commitment to helping professionals succeed in real hiring systems through evidence-based guidance.
More insights from our research team

Facing a workforce adjustment notice in Ottawa’s public service? Learn what it means, your options, and how to prepare your resume, interviews, and next career steps.

Facing a layoff in health care after the Perley Health job cuts? Learn practical steps to stabilize your career, update your resume, prepare for interviews, and find new opportunities.

For training providers managing many learners, common CV tools create inconsistency, review bottlenecks, and risk. This article explains why Canva and Word struggle at scale and what breaks first.

For training providers and colleges, resume outcomes now affect employability results, employer trust, and funding. This article explains why CV quality has become an institutional risk.